|
Post by Los Angeles Kings GM on Dec 2, 2020 12:45:23 GMT -8
To G Petr Mrázek HYB 83 (28) 3.125M UFA 2021 CHI 2022 2ND RD To G Lukas Dostal BUT 70 (20) 0,822 RFA 2023
|
|
|
LAK-ANA
Dec 2, 2020 12:52:31 GMT -8
Post by Colorado Avalanche GM on Dec 2, 2020 12:52:31 GMT -8
this is crazy guys, you have no idea the real values yet. Dostal isn't even worth a 2nd RD pick as he will never play in NHL EVER. If they are 20 years old and aren't atleast a 78-79 they are done unless you use tons of upgrades on them
|
|
|
LAK-ANA
Dec 2, 2020 12:56:57 GMT -8
Post by fisk33n on Dec 2, 2020 12:56:57 GMT -8
I Accept, would even accept without the pick thou. And my original offer was more valueable but this was the one he wanted
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2020 12:57:14 GMT -8
Mrazek was on waiver. The 2nd round pick makes up for the cap dump
|
|
|
LAK-ANA
Dec 2, 2020 12:57:22 GMT -8
Post by Montreal Canadiens GM on Dec 2, 2020 12:57:22 GMT -8
Reject. The chances of Dostal becoming as good as Mrazek are slim to none. Even without the 2nd this is a still a pretty bad trade.
|
|
|
LAK-ANA
Dec 2, 2020 12:58:59 GMT -8
Post by Montreal Canadiens GM on Dec 2, 2020 12:58:59 GMT -8
Mrazek was on waiver. The 2nd round pick makes up for the cap dump It's not even much of a cap dump. 3 million for a pending UFA 83 overall goalie isn't that bad. LA doesn't need to be dumping cap anyways.
|
|
|
LAK-ANA
Dec 2, 2020 14:21:03 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by Winnipeg Jets GM on Dec 2, 2020 14:21:03 GMT -8
Reject.
|
|
|
LAK-ANA
Dec 2, 2020 14:30:00 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by fisk33n on Dec 2, 2020 14:30:00 GMT -8
3 rejects and 2 Accept
LAK can you Day why you want to do this trade? To clear it Up for all (even me 😅)
|
|
|
LAK-ANA
Dec 2, 2020 16:03:41 GMT -8
Post by Los Angeles Kings GM on Dec 2, 2020 16:03:41 GMT -8
3 rejects and 2 Accept LAK can you Day why you want to do this trade? To clear it Up for all (even me 😅) Want to promote someone else to NHL, no future plans for Mrazek, and I have quite a few extra draft picks
|
|
|
Post by Vancouver Canucks GM on Dec 2, 2020 17:17:41 GMT -8
Mrazek was on waiver. The 2nd round pick makes up for the cap dump Kings has 20+ in cap room lol if his roster is right
|
|
|
LAK-ANA
Dec 2, 2020 17:50:56 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by Winnipeg Jets GM on Dec 2, 2020 17:50:56 GMT -8
Mrazek was on waiver. The 2nd round pick makes up for the cap dump Kings has 20+ in cap room lol if his roster is right No one cares about that either apparently... 🙄 All they look at is age anymore, and players are allegedly "useless" once they turn 28. 😂😂 What a joke.
|
|
|
LAK-ANA
Dec 2, 2020 18:01:13 GMT -8
Post by wynne on Dec 2, 2020 18:01:13 GMT -8
Kings has 20+ in cap room lol if his roster is right No one cares about that either apparently... 🙄 All they look at is age anymore, and players are allegedly "useless" once they turn 28. 😂😂 What a joke. I mean feel free to offer up something of substance for a backup goalie making 3M
|
|
|
LAK-ANA
Dec 2, 2020 18:07:43 GMT -8
Post by Montreal Canadiens GM on Dec 2, 2020 18:07:43 GMT -8
No one cares about that either apparently... 🙄 All they look at is age anymore, and players are allegedly "useless" once they turn 28. 😂😂 What a joke. I mean feel free to offer up something of substance for a backup goalie making 3M I mean LA is literally in a better situation if he waives Mrazek lol. If someone claims him then he gets him off the books for nothing. If they don't he has himself a really good AHL goalie and 1.5M for 1 year isn't exactly going to destroy LA's 20+M Cap situation. He's giving away a 2nd round pick for nothing.
|
|
|
LAK-ANA
Dec 2, 2020 18:25:27 GMT -8
Post by fisk33n on Dec 2, 2020 18:25:27 GMT -8
I mean feel free to offer up something of substance for a backup goalie making 3M I mean LA is literally in a better situation if he waives Mrazek lol. If someone claims him then he gets him off the books for nothing. If they don't he has himself a really good AHL goalie and 1.5M for 1 year isn't exactly going to destroy LA's 20+M Cap situation. He's giving away a 2nd round pick for nothing. As I Said it was him that wanted to trade for only this Young Keeper. Mrázek i wanted, have him an other offer. For only mrázek. He counteroffer with this One. I basicly sent THE same offer to 6 other gms för their backups etc with Short contracts. Since that is what i am looking for.
|
|
|
LAK-ANA
Dec 2, 2020 18:25:57 GMT -8
Post by Carolina Hurricanes GM on Dec 2, 2020 18:25:57 GMT -8
I don’t really care about the Dostal for Mrazek swap, but not getting the 2nd RD at all.
It’s definitely a buyers market on goalies right now. But I can understand the reluctance to waive. I don’t even want to waive Quick, and I could use the space
|
|
|
LAK-ANA
Dec 2, 2020 18:45:09 GMT -8
Post by Vancouver Canucks GM on Dec 2, 2020 18:45:09 GMT -8
No one cares about that either apparently... 🙄 All they look at is age anymore, and players are allegedly "useless" once they turn 28. 😂😂 What a joke. I mean feel free to offer up something of substance for a backup goalie making 3M He’s getting a career ahler for a backup and giving up a 2nd lol. I’m taking it kings is rebuilding so why do this deal where he’s giving a 2nd? Mrazek is a ufa after this year so not really a cap dump when he has 20 mill in room. I don’t even care about this trade it’s a minor deal lol I’d just let it go through just a weird trade for kings to make
|
|
|
LAK-ANA
Dec 2, 2020 19:00:28 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by Winnipeg Jets GM on Dec 2, 2020 19:00:28 GMT -8
I mean feel free to offer up something of substance for a backup goalie making 3M He’s getting a career ahler for a backup and giving up a 2nd lol. I’m taking it kings is rebuilding so why do this deal where he’s giving a 2nd? Mrazek is a ufa after this year so not really a cap dump when he has 20 mill in room. I don’t even care about this trade it’s a minor deal lol I’d just let it go through just a weird trade for kings to make Then why did you approve the deal? 😜😂😂
|
|
|
LAK-ANA
Dec 2, 2020 22:44:30 GMT -8
Post by Carolina Hurricanes GM on Dec 2, 2020 22:44:30 GMT -8
This is at 4 and 4
|
|
|
Post by Calgary Flames GM on Dec 3, 2020 0:43:01 GMT -8
Reject, shouldn't give up a 2nd to get rid of a player going on waivers. That 2nd could be really valuable considering Chicago is a bottom table team rn
|
|
|
Post by fisk33n on Dec 3, 2020 1:07:17 GMT -8
That reject makes it final.
|
|